Complicated path for veterans with mesothelioma

14 May 2008 by Wendi Lewis under Legal, News

The prevalence of , especially through the mid-1970s, has put millions of Americans at risk for , a painful, usually lethal cancer almost always related to exposure. Among the hardest hit are U.S. who were exposed occupationally, especially in ships and shipyards.

According to the U.S. Department of Affairs, there are currently 25 million living individuals who have served in the United States’ armed forces. It is believed that a great number of them were exposed to toxic -containing materials during military service.

Every ship and shipyard built by the before the mid-70s was fitted with numerous -containing materials. These materials were extensively used in engine and boiler rooms and other areas below deck for fire safety purposes, as well as in other areas of the ship. In fact, virtually no portion of a naval ship was -free between the 1930s and mid-1970s.

Unfortunately, have little recourse when diagnosed with they believe to be the result of exposure during their time of service. Because use was so widespread before the first bans in the 1970s, it is very difficult for to prove that exposure occurred only in military service.

are not legally allowed to seek compensation for and other -related diseases from the U.S. government through the court system. Ailing must file a claim against the manufacturer, and they also have the legal option to seek assistance through The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

The VA is a government-run benefit system that is responsible for administering benefit programs to , their families, and survivors. It is an incredibly complex system that comprises the second-largest federal department, after the Department of Defense. A search of the organization’s web site turns up no information about or . However, there are some organizations, such as Assistance Network (www.va-claim-help.com), that can help wade through the VA benefits system.

Lung cancer is usually an indolent cancer that takes years to develop, thus the burden of treatment is falling most heavily on the VA. Late stage lung cancer is twice as costly to treat as early stage.

In February the () announced that for the second year in row a coalition of top veteran organizations is calling for a screening program for at high risk of lung cancer, to be included in the Independent Budget for Fiscal Year 2009 (FY09). This highly regarded comprehensive alternative budget addresses the most urgent needs of , and urges Congress and the Department of Affairs to initiate a $3 million pilot screening program for at high risk.

The AMVETS, Disabled American , Paralyzed of America and the of Foreign wars are the four co-authors of this document. More than 50 organizations support the Independent Budget.

A research program carried out by the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program at 40 centers in 26 states and 6 foreign countries during the past 13 years indicates that CT screening can detect lung cancer at Stage 1 in 85 percent of cases, and those treated immediately had a 10-year survival rate of 92 percent. By partnering with these types of programs, the Administration could quickly implement a pilot screening program for at high risk, with a broad geographic reach and significant cost savings.

Rear Admiral Philip J. Coady, USN, (Ret.), chairman of ’s Board of Directors said, “Lung cancer continues to kill more men and women every year than all the other major cancers - breast, prostate, and colon - combined, and our are at even higher risk, especially those whose active duty service exposed them to Agent Orange, , spent nuclear fuels, propellant gases and other carcinogens.”

Admiral Coady, a 34-year veteran who never smoked, was diagnosed with lung cancer three years ago.

“Because there are usually no specific symptoms, most people are diagnosed so late they die within a year,” he pointed out. “Yet advanced CT technology that can diagnose lung cancer at its earliest, most curable stage is available right now, and high-risk not benefiting from this is wrong,” he said.

Sources: .com, VAWatchdog.org