A study published today in The New England Journal of Medicine reveals that Fire Department of New York (FDNY) firefighters and emergency medical services (EMS) workers who responded to the 9/11 attacks at the World Trade Center have suffered significant, persistent declines in lung functions. According to the report, exposure to World Trade Center dust created when the towers collapsed led to “large declines” in lung functions for FDNY rescue workers during the first year, and that “the declines were persistent, without recovery over the next 6 years, leaving a substantial proportion of workers with abnormal lung function.”
The study included 12,781 workers who were present at the WTC site between Sept. 11, 2001 and Sept. 24, 2001, which is 91.6 percent of the workers that were present. The report notes that the event exposed the workers – as well as those living and working in the surrounding area – to a dense cloud of pulverized building materials and chemical byproducts, including pulverized glass and cement, insulation fibers including asbestos, and toxic chemicals.
According to a report in The New York Times that summarizes the study findings, this is the first study to document long-term harm in a large group of firefighters and emergency medical workers who worked at Ground Zero. All of the subjects of the study had had previous lung function tests, providing a baseline for the study.
The study was authored by Dr. David J. Prezant, chief medical officer in the Office of Medical Affairs at the New York City Fire Department. The study was approved by the institutional review board at Montefiore Medical Center.
Results of the study revealed that firefighters, who had heavier exposure to dust by the nature of their work had greater first-year declines than EMS personnel, especially for firefighters who were present in the morning on 9/11, when the dust cloud was most intense after the buildings fell. However, researchers noted they were surprised to see “little or no recovery of average lung function during the 6-year follow-up period.” In fact, they noted continued decline in lung function among the study groups.
Normally, the study notes, “smoke inhalation during firefighting causes relatively mild and reversible respiratory impairment.” Additionally, according to the report, long-term effects of firefighting on pulmonary function also are normally mild.
The average loss of lung function for 9/11 rescue workers is about 10 percent. Most of the loss occurred within the first year after 9/11 exposure, with little or no subsequent recovery.
Thousands of workers injured at Ground Zero have been fighting for compensation from the City of New York. Last month about 10,000 plaintiffs reached a settlement agreement totaling $657.5 million, but a judge rejected the settlement shortly afterward, saying it did not provide enough compensation for the plaintiffs. The matter is now back in negotiations, and a new hearing is set for Monday, according to the Times.
View Comments to “People exposed to toxins at WTC site during 9/11 call for cancer coverage”
First responders deserve better help with their medical conditions. Info on safety and asbestos news at http://www.asbestosremovalsperth.net.au
Yeah i agree, those people are heroes and should be treated as such. The next lot of asbestos victims is expected to come from mainly do it yourself renovators.http://www.safeasbestosremoval.com.au has the information you will require to safely remove toxic asbestos from your home.
An ideal Refrigerant Gas Detection system will be able to detect a range of refrigerants. Older refrigeration systems utilise fluorocarbons such as CFC’s but they are steadily being replaced by more environmentally acceptable refrigerants such as ammonia, sulphur dioxide, carbon dioxide and non-halogenated hydrocarbons such as methane. The use of refrigerants extends to the cold stores, supermarkets, fishing vessels, ice-making plants, food distribution centres and food processing plants. A good gas leak detection company should be able to provide both expert advise and tailored products to ensure that your companies needs are met precisely.
Another key benefit of effective gas detection and the use of fixed refrigerant detection devices is the opportunity to reduce overall operating costs. This is due to many factors – such as the discovery of extreme energy consumption thanks to inefficient refrigeration systems. Some systems also help you to top-up your refrigerant gases on a timely basis.
Another key benefit of effective gas detection and the use of fixed refrigerant detection devices is the opportunity to reduce overall operating costs. This is due to many factors – such as the discovery of extreme energy consumption thanks to inefficient refrigeration systems. Some systems also help you to top-up your refrigerant gases on a timely basis.
Regardless of the application, desiccant dehydration offers substantial benefits for drying sour gas. Desiccant tablets react only with water and their performance is unaffected by gas composition. Tablets do not react with hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, oxygen or other gases. Service interval can be extended by simply over-sizing the vessel, or by using several vessels in parallel. Unlike TEG systems, there is no continuous odor, and the operator does not have to dispose of contaminated TEG.
You can use your refrigerant monitors to help you to quickly identify the spot where a gas leak is occurring (some of the gas leaks that you could pick up include CO2, ammonia, halocarbons and hydrocarbons); you will also be able to scan the atmosphere for the exact amount of combustible gas levels (gases include propane, methane, butane, LPG, hydrogen and quite a few more) and as an added bonus – detect toxic and VOC gases in the atmosphere (such as acetone, benzene, ethanol and quite a few others).
The 9/11 Disaster or the WTC attack brought the world to a standstill position. After half a decade the 9/11 massacre is not just fresh in our minds as an incident, many of us are actually carrying the remains of this devastation within us.
The implementation of this new system will need a fresh start because if you were to combine the two it will cause the very same problems that the R-22 is said to be causing. The old system could have moisture retained inside the piping and this does not go well with the functions of the new R-410a.
Leave a Reply